Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2020 vs Chevrolet Captiva 2019
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Land Rover Range Rover Velar) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Chevrolet Captiva) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 149 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 249 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar engine produces 151 HP more power than Chevrolet Captiva, whereas torque is 151 NM more than Chevrolet Captiva. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 2.3 l/100km | ||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 69 litres | 52 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.75 m | |
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 625 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 625 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1693 litres | 1081 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover Velar (by 612 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`720 kg | 2`160 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 30 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
|
| |