Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2020 vs BMW X4 2018
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Hybrid engines (Land Rover Range Rover Velar) excel in urban environments with superior fuel efficiency and lower emissions during stop-and-go driving. Diesel engines (BMW X4), however, are more fuel-efficient on long highway trips and provide greater torque for towing and heavy loads. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Velar engine produces 110 HP more power than BMW X4, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Velar reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 2.3 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 10.10 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Diesel€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 69 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 3000 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 214 mm (8.4 inches) | 204 mm (8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Velar can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| BMW X4 2018 2.0 engine: A fairly reliable engine with a long service life. On the whole, the chains are more reliable than in the BMW N-series engines, but they also have a tendency to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs to be ... More about BMW X4 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.62 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 625 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1693 litres | 1430 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The BMW X4 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover Velar (by 263 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 0.3 metres more than that of the BMW X4. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`720 kg | 2`400 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`158 kg | 1`740 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 562 kg | 660 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 17 procentiem less than BMW X4. Therefore, BMW X4 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 30 000 | 32 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
|
BMW X4 has
| |