Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017 vs Volvo XC90 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 320 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar engine produces 70 HP less power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Volvo XC90. Despite less power, Land Rover Range Rover Velar reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 7.7 | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Velar over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 360'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Land Rover Range Rover Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo S60, Volvo XC60, Volvo S90, Volvo V90 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo XC90 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.78 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 15 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 2 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 673 litres | 615 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1886 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Velar has 58 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90. The Volvo XC90 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`470 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo XC90 scores higher in safety tests. The Volvo XC90 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 43 200 | 26 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |