Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017 vs Porsche Macan 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 252 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 seconds | 6.7 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar engine produces 2 HP less power than Porsche Macan, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Porsche Macan. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 7.4 | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Porsche Macan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Porsche Macan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Land Rover Range Rover Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A6, Audi A7 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover Velar engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Porsche Macan 2013 2.0 engine: This engine, while more reliable than previous versions of the EA88 series, still has several characteristic issues. The main problems include:
Timing chain stretching. The chain typically lasts around ... More about Porsche Macan 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar is larger. Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 11 cm longer than the Porsche Macan, 11 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 673 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1500 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Velar has 173 litres more trunk space than the Porsche Macan. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 0.4 metres less than that of the Porsche Macan, which means Land Rover Range Rover Velar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`470 | 2`445 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 43 000 | 30 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
|
Porsche Macan has
| |