Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017 vs Mercedes GLC 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 211 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Velar engine produces 39 HP more power than Mercedes GLC, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Mercedes GLC. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Velar reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 7.1 | |
|
The Mercedes GLC is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Velar consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes GLC, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes GLC gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Land Rover Range Rover Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes A klase, Mercedes B klase | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes GLC might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mercedes GLC 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is economical for its power output but has several notable weaknesses. Problems with variable valve timing regulators (phasors) are common, often requiring attention due to malfunctions. The timing ... More about Mercedes GLC 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar is larger. Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 15 cm longer than the Mercedes GLC, 14 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 673 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1600 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Velar has 123 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes GLC. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mercedes GLC. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`470 | 2`400 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 43 200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
|
Mercedes GLC has
| |