Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017 vs Lexus RX 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 277 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 NM | 346 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Velar engine produces 27 HP less power than Lexus RX, but torque is 19 NM more than Lexus RX. Despite less power, Land Rover Range Rover Velar reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 10.6 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Velar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Velar consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lexus RX, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Velar over 15,000 km in a year you can save 450 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Land Rover Range Rover Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota RAV4, Toyota Camry, Toyota Sienna, Lexus ES | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Lexus RX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar is larger, but lower. Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 3 cm longer than the Lexus RX, 15 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 673 litres | 446 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1570 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Velar has 227 litres more trunk space than the Lexus RX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 0.2 metres more than that of the Lexus RX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`470 | 2`545 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Lexus RX scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 50 400 | 28 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
|
Lexus RX has
| |