Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 247 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 570 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Velar engine produces 53 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 130 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Velar reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Velar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Velar consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Velar over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Velar consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 89 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 1040 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Used also on Chrysler 300C | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Velar might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.78 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 3 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 9 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 673 litres | 782 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1554 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Land Rover Range Rover Velar has 109 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`610 | 2`949 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 50 400 | 26 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |