Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Velar engine produces 123 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 250 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Velar reaches 100 km/h speed 6.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Velar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Velar consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Velar over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Velar consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Velar engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Used also on Toyota Hilux | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Velar might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.85 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 4 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 18 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 18 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 673 litres | 621 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Velar has 52 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser. The Toyota Land Cruiser may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`610 | 2`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 50 400 | 54 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |