Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017 vs Mercedes ML 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 620 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Velar engine produces 42 HP more power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Mercedes ML. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Velar reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Velar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Velar consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Velar over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Velar consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes S klase | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes ML might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.80 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar and Mercedes ML are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 673 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`610 | 2`950 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 43 200 | 18 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |