Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017 vs Jeep Wrangler 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar engine produces 40 HP more power than Jeep Wrangler, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Jeep Wrangler. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 9.4 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Velar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Velar consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Wrangler, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Velar over 15,000 km in a year you can save 450 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 69 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Velar engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Velar might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar is larger, but lower. Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 2 cm longer than the Jeep Wrangler, 16 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 20 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 673 litres | 898 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2050 litres | |
|
Jeep Wrangler has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Land Rover Range Rover Velar has 225 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Wrangler. This could mean that the Land Rover Range Rover Velar uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 0.4 metres less than that of the Jeep Wrangler, which means Land Rover Range Rover Velar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`610 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar scores higher in safety tests, but Jeep Wrangler is better rated in child safety tests. The Land Rover Range Rover Velar scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 37 000 | 45 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
|
Jeep Wrangler has
| |