Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017 vs Jaguar F-Pace 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 seconds | 6.2 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar and Jaguar F-Pace have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Land Rover Range Rover Velar reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Velar is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Velar consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar F-Pace, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Land Rover Range Rover Velar consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar F-Pace. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jaguar XJ, Jaguar XF | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Velar might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.65 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 7 cm longer than the Jaguar F-Pace, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 673 litres | 508 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 650 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Velar has 165 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar F-Pace. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 0.7 metres less than that of the Jaguar F-Pace, which means Land Rover Range Rover Velar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`610 | 2`570 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 50 400 | 30 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
|
Jaguar F-Pace has
| |