Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017 vs BMW X4 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Velar engine produces 110 HP more power than BMW X4, whereas torque is 300 NM more than BMW X4. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Velar reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Velar consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Velar consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Velar engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW X3, BMW 6 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Velar might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X4 2018 2.0 engine: A fairly reliable engine with a long service life. On the whole, the chains are more reliable than in the BMW N-series engines, but they also have a tendency to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs to be ... More about BMW X4 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar is larger. Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 5 cm longer than the BMW X4, 11 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 673 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1430 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Velar has 148 litres more trunk space than the BMW X4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 0.5 metres less than that of the BMW X4, which means Land Rover Range Rover Velar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`610 | 2`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 43 200 | 37 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
|
BMW X4 has
| |