Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017 vs BMW X3 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 265 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 620 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 seconds | 5.8 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar engine produces 35 HP more power than BMW X3, whereas torque is 80 NM more than BMW X3. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover Velar reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Velar consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Velar consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery, Land Rover Range Rover Sport | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X6, BMW 6 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar is larger, but slightly lower. Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 10 cm longer than the BMW X3, 14 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 673 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1600 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Velar has 123 litres more trunk space than the BMW X3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 0.4 metres less than that of the BMW X3, which means Land Rover Range Rover Velar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`610 | 2`500 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Land Rover Range Rover Velar scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 50 400 | 33 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
|
BMW X3 has
| |