Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017 vs Volvo XC90 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 225 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Velar engine produces 15 HP more power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Volvo XC90. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Velar reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 251 mm (9.9 inches) | 238 mm (9.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Velar can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.78 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 15 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 2 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 673 litres | 615 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1731 litres | 1886 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Volvo XC90 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 155 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`510 kg | 2`750 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`841 kg | 2`078 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 669 kg | 672 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo XC90 scores higher in safety tests. The Volvo XC90 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 26 200 | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |