Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017 vs Toyota Yaris 2007
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 173 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Velar engine produces 107 HP more power than Toyota Yaris, whereas torque is 327 NM more than Toyota Yaris. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Velar reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Velar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Velar consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Velar over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Velar consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km with real consumption | 530 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Yaris engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Jaguar XF, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar E-Pace | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Toyota Yaris 2007 1.8 engine: This engine is generally considered decent, with a lifespan of around 250,000 km. While it doesn’t cause major issues if properly maintained, some common problems still arise.
One of the most frequent ... More about Toyota Yaris 2007 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 3.80 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar is larger. Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 100 cm longer than the Toyota Yaris, 33 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 673 litres | 275 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Velar has 398 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 2.2 metres more than that of the Toyota Yaris, which means Land Rover Range Rover Velar can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`510 | 1`050 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 43 200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |