Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017 vs Porsche Macan 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 252 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 6.7 seconds | |
|
Porsche Macan is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover Velar engine produces 12 HP less power than Porsche Macan, but torque is 130 NM more than Porsche Macan. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover Velar reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Velar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Velar consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Porsche Macan, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Velar over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Velar consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Porsche Macan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Porsche Macan engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Jaguar XF, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar E-Pace | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A6, Audi A7 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover Velar engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Porsche Macan 2013 2.0 engine: This engine, while more reliable than previous versions of the EA88 series, still has several characteristic issues. The main problems include:
Timing chain stretching. The chain typically lasts around ... More about Porsche Macan 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar is larger. Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 11 cm longer than the Porsche Macan, 11 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 673 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1500 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Velar has 173 litres more trunk space than the Porsche Macan. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 0.4 metres less than that of the Porsche Macan, which means Land Rover Range Rover Velar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`510 | 2`445 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 43 200 | 29 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
|
Porsche Macan has
| |