Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017 vs Mercedes GLC 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Velar engine produces 70 HP more power than Mercedes GLC, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Mercedes GLC. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Velar reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Land Rover Range Rover Velar consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes GLC, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Land Rover Range Rover Velar consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes GLC. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes GLC engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Jaguar XF, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar E-Pace | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML, Mercedes A klase | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes GLC might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mercedes GLC 2015 2.1 engine: The engine has a long service life if it is serviced on time and has reasonable fuel consumption. The most common problems are caused by the engine chain tensioner and the fuel delivery system. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar is larger. Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 27 cm longer than the Mercedes GLC, 19 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 673 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1600 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Velar has 123 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes GLC. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mercedes GLC. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`510 | 2`500 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 43 200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
|
Mercedes GLC has
| |