Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017 vs Jaguar F-Pace 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Velar engine produces 60 HP more power than Jaguar F-Pace, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Jaguar F-Pace. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Velar reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Land Rover Range Rover Velar consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar F-Pace, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar could require 75 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Land Rover Range Rover Velar consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar F-Pace. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jaguar F-Pace engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Jaguar XF, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar E-Pace | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE, Land Rover Discovery Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar F-Pace might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.65 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 7 cm longer than the Jaguar F-Pace, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 673 litres | 508 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 650 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Velar has 165 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar F-Pace. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 0.7 metres less than that of the Jaguar F-Pace, which means Land Rover Range Rover Velar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`510 | 2`460 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 50 400 | 30 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
|
Jaguar F-Pace has
| |