Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017 vs BMW X3 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Velar engine produces 50 HP more power than BMW X3, whereas torque is 100 NM more than BMW X3. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Velar reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Land Rover Range Rover Velar consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar could require 90 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Land Rover Range Rover Velar consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1280 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Land Rover Defender, Jaguar XF, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar E-Pace | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW 2 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X3 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X3 2014 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great resource. Overall, the chains are more reliable than in BMW N-series engines, but also tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine requires good quality fuel, maintenance and ... More about BMW X3 2014 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar is larger. Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 15 cm longer than the BMW X3, 15 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 673 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1600 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Velar has 123 litres more trunk space than the BMW X3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 0.3 metres less than that of the BMW X3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`510 | 2`365 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 43 200 | 20 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
|
BMW X3 has
| |