Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017 vs Volvo XC90 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 225 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover Velar engine produces 45 HP less power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Volvo XC90. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover Velar reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Velar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Velar consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Velar over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Velar consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo XC90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.78 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 15 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 2 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 673 litres | 615 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1886 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Velar has 58 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90. The Volvo XC90 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`490 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo XC90 scores higher in safety tests. The Volvo XC90 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 43 200 | 26 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |