Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017 vs Porsche Macan 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover Velar) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Porsche Macan) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 252 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 6.7 seconds | |
|
Porsche Macan is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover Velar engine produces 72 HP less power than Porsche Macan, but torque is 60 NM more than Porsche Macan. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover Velar reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 9.7 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Velar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Velar consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Porsche Macan, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Velar over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Velar consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Porsche Macan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A6, Audi A7 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Velar might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover Velar engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017 2.0 engine Porsche Macan 2013 2.0 engine: This engine, while more reliable than previous versions of the EA88 series, still has several characteristic issues. The main problems include: Timing chain stretching. The chain typically lasts around ... More about Porsche Macan 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar is larger. Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 11 cm longer than the Porsche Macan, 11 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 673 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1500 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Velar has 173 litres more trunk space than the Porsche Macan. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 0.4 metres less than that of the Porsche Macan, which means Land Rover Range Rover Velar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`490 | 2`445 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 42 600 | 30 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
|
Porsche Macan has
| |