Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2023 vs Nissan X-Trail 2022
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan X-Trail can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Nissan X-Trail also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 1.5 - 2.5 (petrol) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 - 400 HP | 158 - 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 - 650 NM | 244 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 - 8.3 seconds | 7 - 9.6 seconds | |
| In general, Land Rover Range Rover Velar are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Nissan X-Trail. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.9 - 10.2 | 6.2 - 7.6 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar petrol engines consumes on average 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 214 - 251 mm (8.4 - 9.9 inches) | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.73 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 748 litres | 585 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1811 litres | 1424 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover Velar (by 387 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 0.8 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Land Rover Range Rover Velar can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | ~ 2`302 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 33 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |