Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2023 vs Mercedes GLC 2022
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mercedes GLC can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mercedes GLC also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 1.5 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 - 400 HP | 163 - 476 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 - 650 NM | 250 - 750 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 - 8.3 seconds | 3.5 - 8.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.9 - 10.2 | 0.8 - 10.2 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes GLC. On average, Land Rover Range Rover Velar equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes GLC. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 214 - 251 mm (8.4 - 9.9 inches) | 194 - 300 mm (7.6 - 11.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Velar can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.64 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 748 litres | 620 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1811 litres | 1680 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Mercedes GLC may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover Velar (by 131 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 1.1 metres less than that of the Mercedes GLC, which means Land Rover Range Rover Velar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | ~ 2`625 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
|
Mercedes GLC has
| |