Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2023 vs Lexus NX 2021
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Lexus NX can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Lexus NX also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 2.4 - 2.5 (petrol, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and hybrid engines. Land Rover Range Rover Velar is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 - 400 HP | 185 - 275 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 - 650 NM | 227 - 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 - 8.3 seconds | 6.3 - 8.7 seconds | |
| In general, Land Rover Range Rover Velar are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Lexus NX. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.9 - 10.2 | 1.1 - 9.4 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar petrol engines consumes on average 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Lexus NX. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 214 - 251 mm (8.4 - 9.9 inches) | 195 mm (7.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Velar can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 748 litres | 643 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1811 litres | 1436 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Lexus NX may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover Velar (by 375 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 0.3 metres more than that of the Lexus NX. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | ~ 2`413 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 46 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
|
Lexus NX has
| |