Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2023 vs BMW X3 2024
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while BMW X3 can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, BMW X3 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 1.6 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 - 400 HP | 190 - 381 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 - 650 NM | 310 - 650 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 - 8.3 seconds | 4.6 - 8.4 seconds | |
| In general, Land Rover Range Rover Velar are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than BMW X3. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.9 - 10.2 | 1.1 - 8.3 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW X3. On average, Land Rover Range Rover Velar equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 214 - 251 mm (8.4 - 9.9 inches) | 208 - 216 mm (8.2 - 8.5 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 748 litres | 570 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1811 litres | 1700 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The BMW X3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover Velar (by 111 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 0.3 metres less than that of the BMW X3. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | ~ 2`559 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
|
BMW X3 has
| |