Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2020 vs Toyota RAV4 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Toyota RAV4 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota RAV4 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Toyota RAV4 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and hybrid engines. Land Rover Range Rover Velar is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 - 400 HP | 149 - 222 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 - 650 NM | 206 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 - 8.2 seconds | 6 - 11 seconds | |
| In general, Land Rover Range Rover Velar are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Toyota RAV4. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 2.3 - 8.9 | 1.0 - 8.4 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota RAV4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 214 - 251 mm (8.4 - 9.9 inches) | 180 - 218 mm (7.1 - 8.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Velar can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 748 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1811 litres | 1977 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Toyota RAV4 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 166 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 0.6 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Land Rover Range Rover Velar can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`720 kg | ~ 2`127 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`987 kg | ~ 1`612 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 733 kg | ~ 515 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 30 procentiem more than Toyota RAV4. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover Velar is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 27 800 | 25 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |