Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2020 vs BMW X1 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas BMW X1 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while BMW X1 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, BMW X1 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 - 400 HP | 116 - 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 - 650 NM | 220 - 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 - 8.2 seconds | 6.5 - 11.5 seconds | |
| In general, Land Rover Range Rover Velar are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than BMW X1. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 2.3 - 8.9 | 2.0 - 6.8 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW X1. On average, Land Rover Range Rover Velar equipped with diesel engines consume 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 214 - 251 mm (8.4 - 9.9 inches) | 147 - 183 mm (5.8 - 7.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Velar can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.60 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 748 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1811 litres | 1550 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The BMW X1 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover Velar (by 261 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 1 metres more than that of the BMW X1, which means Land Rover Range Rover Velar can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`720 kg | ~ 2`126 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`987 kg | ~ 1`544 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 733 kg | ~ 582 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem more than BMW X1. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover Velar is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 30 000 | 28 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
|
BMW X1 has
| |