Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017 vs Volvo XC90 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo XC90 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volvo XC90 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 - 380 HP | 190 - 320 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 - 700 NM | 350 - 480 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.7 - 8.9 seconds | 5.6 - 9.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 9.4 | 2.1 - 8.1 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC90. On average, Land Rover Range Rover Velar equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.78 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 15 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 9 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 673 litres | 615 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1886 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Range Rover Velar has 58 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90. The Volvo XC90 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 0.9 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Land Rover Range Rover Velar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`524 | ~ 2`880 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo XC90 scores higher in safety tests. The Volvo XC90 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 43 200 | 26 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |