Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017 vs Mercedes GLC 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 - 4.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 180 - 380 HP | 170 - 510 HP | |
Torque: | 365 - 700 NM | 350 - 700 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.7 - 8.9 seconds | 3.8 - 8.3 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 9.4 | 5.5 - 10.7 | |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes GLC. On average, Land Rover Range Rover Velar equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes GLC. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.80 m | 4.65 m | |
Width: | 2.03 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.67 m | 1.64 m | |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar is larger. Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 16 cm longer than the Mercedes GLC, 15 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 673 litres | 550 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1600 litres | |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Velar has 123 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes GLC. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mercedes GLC, which means Land Rover Range Rover Velar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`524 | ~ 2`503 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | no data | high | |
Average price (€): | 43 200 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
|
Mercedes GLC has
| |