Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017 vs BMW X3 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas BMW X3 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while BMW X3 can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, BMW X3 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 - 380 HP | 150 - 313 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 - 700 NM | 270 - 630 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.7 - 8.9 seconds | 5.3 - 9.8 seconds | |
| In general, Land Rover Range Rover Velar are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than BMW X3. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 9.4 | 5.0 - 8.3 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW X3. On average, Land Rover Range Rover Velar equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 251 mm (9.9 inches) | 204 mm (8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Velar can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar is larger. Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 15 cm longer than the BMW X3, 15 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 673 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1731 litres | 1600 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Velar has 123 litres more trunk space than the BMW X3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover Velar (by 131 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 0.3 metres less than that of the BMW X3. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`524 kg | ~ 2`350 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`863 kg | ~ 1`747 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 661 kg | ~ 603 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 9 procentiem more than BMW X3. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover Velar is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 26 600 | 18 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
|
BMW X3 has
| |