Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2017 vs Audi Q3 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Audi Q3 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Audi Q3 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Audi Q3 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Audi Q3 is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 - 380 HP | 150 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 - 700 NM | 250 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.7 - 8.9 seconds | 5.8 - 9.6 seconds | |
| In general, Land Rover Range Rover Velar are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Audi Q3. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 9.4 | 1.7 - 9.2 | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi Q3. On average, Land Rover Range Rover Velar equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 251 mm (9.9 inches) | 191 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Velar can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar is larger. Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 32 cm longer than the Audi Q3, 18 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 673 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1731 litres | 1525 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Range Rover Velar has 143 litres more trunk space than the Audi Q3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover Velar (by 206 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is 0.2 metres less than that of the Audi Q3. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`524 kg | ~ 2`182 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`863 kg | ~ 1`604 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 661 kg | ~ 578 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Velar load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem more than Audi Q3. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover Velar is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| The Audi Q3 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 26 000 | 27 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar has
|
Audi Q3 has
| |