Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2006 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009

 
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
2006 - 2009
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
2009 - 2013
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.6 Diesel3.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 275 HP272 HP
Torque: 640 NM640 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 seconds9.2 seconds
Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2006 engine produces 3 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009, the torque is the same for both cars.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.111.1
Fuel tank capacity: 84 litres84 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 750 km in combined cycle750 km in combined cycle
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance: 227 mm (8.9 inches)227 mm (8.9 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.79 m4.79 m
Width: 1.93 m2.00 m
Height: 1.76 m1.78 m
Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2006 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 960 litres958 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
2013 litres2013 litres
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters11.9 meters
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2006 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009.
Power steering: Hydraulic power steeringElectric power steering
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering.
Gross weight: 3`175 kg3`175 kg
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 48008800
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
  • hydraulic power steering
  • lower price
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
  • electric power steering
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv