Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.4 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 425 NM | 410 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 69 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.9 | 14.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 86 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 520 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 650 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 227 mm (8.9 inches) | 204 mm (8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Sport can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | Used also on Jeep Commander | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is larger. Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 4 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 6 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 958 litres | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2013 litres | 1909 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Land Rover Range Rover Sport uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover Sport (by 104 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.4 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Land Rover Range Rover Sport can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`070 kg | 2`750 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`480 kg | 2`092 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 590 kg | 658 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Therefore, Jeep Grand Cherokee is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |