Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2005
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 4.4 Petrol | 4.4 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 300 HP | 306 HP | |
Torque: | 425 NM | 425 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
Land Rover Range Rover is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 6 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.9 | 14.9 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 86 litres | 100 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 560'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.79 m | 4.95 m | |
Width: | 1.93 m | 1.96 m | |
Height: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is smaller. Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 16 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 535 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`500 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 5600 | 7400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |