Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005 vs Audi Q7 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.4 Petrol | 4.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 350 HP | |
| Torque: | 425 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
|
Audi Q7 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 50 HP less power than Audi Q7, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Audi Q7. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.9 | 13.6 | |
|
The Audi Q7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 86 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| Audi Q7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | Used also on Volkswagen Touareg | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Sport might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Audi Q7 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is smaller, but slightly higher. Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 30 cm shorter than the Audi Q7, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 775 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 775 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2035 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.4 metres less than that of the Audi Q7, which means Land Rover Range Rover Sport can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`935 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Audi Q7 has
| |