Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2005

 
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
2005 - 2009
Land Rover Range Rover
2005 - 2009
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 4.2 Petrol4.2 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 390 HP396 HP
Torque: 550 NM560 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.6 seconds7.5 seconds
Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 6 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 15.916.0
Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Sport over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 86 litres100 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 540 km in combined cycle620 km in combined cycle
Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 4 years4 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.79 m4.95 m
Width: 1.93 m1.96 m
Height: 1.78 m1.82 m
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is smaller.
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 16 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data535 litres
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters11.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data3`500
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 66007000
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
  • lower price
Land Rover Range Rover has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv