Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005 vs Audi Q7 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.2 Petrol | 4.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 390 HP | 350 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 40 HP more power than Audi Q7, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Audi Q7. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.9 | 13.6 | |
|
The Audi Q7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport could require 345 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 86 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 540 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Audi Q7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover | Used also on Volkswagen Touareg | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Audi Q7 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is smaller, but slightly higher. Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 30 cm shorter than the Audi Q7, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 958 litres | 775 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 775 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 958 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2013 litres | 2035 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi Q7 (by 22 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.4 metres less than that of the Audi Q7, which means Land Rover Range Rover Sport can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`125 kg | 2`935 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`572 kg | 2`240 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 553 kg | 695 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 26 procentiem less than Audi Q7. Therefore, Audi Q7 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Audi Q7 has
| |