Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005 vs Volvo XC90 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 27 HP more power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Volvo XC90. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 8.5 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 82 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 227 mm (8.9 inches) | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 958 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 958 litres | 613 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2013 litres | 1837 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space (by 345 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover Sport (by 176 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.9 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Land Rover Range Rover Sport can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`070 kg | 2`680 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |