Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 28 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 10.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 82 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Grand Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Discovery | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler 300C, Jeep Commander | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Grand Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is larger. Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 4 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 6 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1909 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.4 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Land Rover Range Rover Sport can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |