Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005 vs Porsche Cayenne 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 4.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 340 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
|
Porsche Cayenne is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 150 HP less power than Porsche Cayenne, but torque is 20 NM more than Porsche Cayenne. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 5.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 14.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 16.0 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 4.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Porsche Cayenne, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Sport over 15,000 km in a year you can save 705 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Porsche Cayenne. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 82 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Discovery | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Sport might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.70 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 1 cm longer than the Porsche Cayenne, width is practically the same , while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1770 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.2 metres more than that of the Porsche Cayenne. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`080 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Porsche Cayenne has
| |