Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Double-row timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 403 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 16 HP more power than Nissan Pathfinder, whereas torque is 37 NM more than Nissan Pathfinder. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 11.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 82 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Pathfinder engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 28 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Discovery | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Navara, Nissan Murano | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Pathfinder might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is larger. Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 5 cm longer than the Nissan Pathfinder, 8 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 515 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 515 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2091 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.8 metres less than that of the Nissan Pathfinder, which means Land Rover Range Rover Sport can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`880 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |