Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005 vs Mercedes ML 2008

 
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
2005 - 2009
Mercedes ML
2008 - 2011
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.7 Diesel3.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chain and beltTiming chain

Performance

Power: 190 HP224 HP
Torque: 440 NM510 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.7 seconds8.6 seconds
Mercedes ML is a more dynamic driving.
Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 34 HP less power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Mercedes ML. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.29.3
Real fuel consumption: 11.0 l/100km10.7 l/100km
The Mercedes ML is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport could require 135 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML.
Fuel tank capacity: 82 litres95 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 800 km in combined cycle1020 km in combined cycle
740 km with real consumption880 km with real consumption
Mercedes ML gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Engine production duration: 6 years19 years
Engine spread: Used also on Land Rover DiscoveryInstalled on at least 10 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes S klase
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes ML might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.79 m4.78 m
Width: 1.93 m1.91 m
Height: 1.78 m1.82 m
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is larger, but slightly lower.
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 1 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 2 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data551 litres
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters11.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data2`830
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 66009200
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
  • lower price
Mercedes ML has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv