Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005 engine produces 55 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009, whereas torque is 160 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 9.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 12.1 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005 could require 150 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 82 litres | 84 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 227 mm (8.9 inches) | 227 mm (8.9 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Discovery | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 958 litres | 958 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2013 litres | 2013 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`070 kg | 3`175 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |