Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 190 HP | 245 HP | |
Torque: | 440 NM | 600 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005 engine produces 55 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009, whereas torque is 160 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 9.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 12.1 l/100km | |
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005 could require 150 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 6 years | 16 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Discovery | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.79 m | 4.78 m | |
Width: | 1.93 m | 2.00 m | |
Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`175 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 5600 | 9600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |