Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005 vs BMW X5 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 235 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 520 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 45 HP less power than BMW X5, whereas torque is 80 NM less than BMW X5. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport could require 315 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 82 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1230 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 227 mm (8.9 inches) | 222 mm (8.7 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW X5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Discovery | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X5 2007 3.0 engine: The BMW M57 engine is regarded as one of the best German-built power units. Its inline-six layout is praised for reliability, and cars equipped with this engine are often more desirable on the used market. Despite delivering strong performance, the ... More about BMW X5 2007 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 6 cm shorter than the BMW X5, width is practically the same , while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 958 litres | 620 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2013 litres | 1750 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The BMW X5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover Sport (by 263 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 1.4 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means Land Rover Range Rover Sport can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`070 kg | 2`755 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`455 kg | 2`075 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 615 kg | 680 kg | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem less than BMW X5. Therefore, BMW X5 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
BMW X5 has
| |