Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005 vs Audi Q7 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 233 HP | |
| Torque: | 440 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Audi Q7 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 43 HP less power than Audi Q7, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Audi Q7. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 11.8 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Sport over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 82 litres | 100 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 500'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi Q7 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 2 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Land Rover Discovery | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Sport might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is smaller, but slightly higher. Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 30 cm shorter than the Audi Q7, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 775 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 775 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2035 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.4 metres less than that of the Audi Q7, which means Land Rover Range Rover Sport can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Audi Q7 has
| |