Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 vs Volvo XC90 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 82 HP more power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 260 NM more than Volvo XC90. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 8.2 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 84 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 227 mm (8.9 inches) | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 7 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 958 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 958 litres | 600 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2013 litres | 1837 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space (by 358 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover Sport (by 176 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Land Rover Range Rover Sport can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 3`175 kg | 2`680 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |