Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 241 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 4 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 8.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.1 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | Used also on Chrysler 300C | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Sport might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 4 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 6 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 780 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1554 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`175 | 2`949 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 600 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |