Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 vs Volkswagen Touareg 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 5 HP more power than Volkswagen Touareg, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Volkswagen Touareg. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.1 l/100km | 10.1 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Touareg is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touareg, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport could require 270 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touareg. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.71 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 1 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Touareg, 6 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1642 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`175 | 2`860 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 14 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Volkswagen Touareg has
| |