Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Double-row timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 600 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 55 HP more power than Nissan Pathfinder, whereas torque is 150 NM more than Nissan Pathfinder. Thanks to more power Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.1 l/100km | 11.1 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Pathfinder is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 84 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 28 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Navara, Nissan Murano | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 2 cm shorter than the Nissan Pathfinder, 16 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 958 litres | 190 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2013 litres | 2091 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Nissan Pathfinder may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pathfinder (by 78 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 3`175 kg | 2`880 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |