Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2009 vs Mercedes ML 2008

 
Land Rover Range Rover Sport
2009 - 2013
Mercedes ML
2008 - 2011
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.0 Diesel3.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chain and beltTiming chain

Performance

Power: 245 HP224 HP
Torque: 600 NM510 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.3 seconds8.6 seconds
Land Rover Range Rover Sport engine produces 21 HP more power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Mercedes ML. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.29.3
Real fuel consumption: 12.1 l/100km10.7 l/100km
The Mercedes ML is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that by driving the Land Rover Range Rover Sport over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Land Rover Range Rover Sport consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML.
Fuel tank capacity: 84 litres95 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 910 km in combined cycle1020 km in combined cycle
690 km with real consumption880 km with real consumption
Mercedes ML gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance: 227 mm (8.9 inches)210 mm (8.3 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover Sport can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Engines

Engine production duration: 17 years21 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover DiscoveryInstalled on at least 9 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes G klase
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes ML might be a better choice in this respect.
Mercedes ML 2008 3.0 engine: A reliable yet dynamic engine. Frequent oil leaks, engine crankcase ventilation problems.

Dimensions

Length: 4.79 m4.78 m
Width: 2.00 m1.91 m
Height: 1.78 m1.82 m
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is larger, but slightly lower.
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 1 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 9 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 958 litres551 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
2013 litres2050 litres
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has 407 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes ML. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes ML (by 37 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.9 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mercedes ML.
Power steering: Electric power steeringHydraulic power steering
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering.
Gross weight: 3`175 kg2`830 kg
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 86007600
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
  • more power
  • higher ground clearance
  • roomier boot
  • electric power steering
Mercedes ML has
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • hydraulic power steering
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv